LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <>
Subject: Re: "obsolete" versus "deprecated", and a new config option?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:54:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:51:27 EST." <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701171134440.1878@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 818 bytes --]

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:51:27 EST, "Robert P. J. Day" said:
>   in any event, what about introducing a new config variable,
> OBSOLETE, under "Code maturity level options"?  this would seem to be
> a quick and dirty way to prune anything that is *supposed* to be
> obsolete from the build, to make sure you're not picking up dead code
> by accident.
>   i think it would be useful to be able to make that kind of
> distinction since, as the devfs writer pointed out above, the point of
> labelling something "obsolete" is not to *discourage* someone from
> using a feature, it's to imply that they *shouldn't* be using that
> feature.  period.  which suggests there should be an easy, one-step
> way to enforce that absolutely in a build.

How much of the 'OBSOLETE' code should just be labelled 'BROKEN' instead?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-01-17 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-17 16:51 Robert P. J. Day
2007-01-17 18:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-17 18:42   ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-01-17 21:54 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2007-01-17 22:04   ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-01-17 22:54     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-01-17 22:51       ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-01-18 21:37         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: "obsolete" versus "deprecated", and a new config option?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).