On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:04:20 EST, "Robert P. J. Day" said:

> > How much of the 'OBSOLETE' code should just be labelled 'BROKEN'
> > instead?
> 
> the stuff that's actually "broken."  :-)

Right - the question is how much code qualifies as either/both, and which
we should use when we encounter the random driver that's both obsolete
*and* broken...