From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932814AbXAXWe7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:34:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932821AbXAXWe7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:34:59 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52333 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932814AbXAXWe7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:34:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:34:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070124.143433.66178294.davem@davemloft.net> To: kristrev@student.matnat.uio.no Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Retransmission and packet handling in the TCP-code From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <60609.129.240.228.21.1169645615.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> References: <60609.129.240.228.21.1169645615.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Can you _PLEASE_ not send this independantly to 3 different linux mailing lists? It WILL NOT increase the chances of someone replying to you, in fact for the folks who are on all of those lists (like me) it will irritate them to no end and make them NOT want to reply to your questions. Thanks.