LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Boot problems with pata_via driver @ 2007-01-28 11:47 Patrick Ale 2007-01-28 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-28 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Hi, With kernel 2.6.19 I was able to boot using the pata_via driver I tried to compile 2.6.20-rc6 and now I get a "unknown device: sda3" error when I try to boot. I compiled 2.6.20-rc6 by copying over the .config from the 2.6.19 tree and running a make oldconfig && make Am I doing something wrong? Patrick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Boot problems with pata_via driver 2007-01-28 11:47 Boot problems with pata_via driver Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-28 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk [not found] ` <8d158e1f0701282330o3591a226lb664644ffdb025f0@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Adrian Bunk @ 2007-01-28 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patrick Ale, Alan Cox, jgarzik; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-ide On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:47:18PM +0100, Patrick Ale wrote: > Hi, Hi Patrick, > With kernel 2.6.19 I was able to boot using the pata_via driver > I tried to compile 2.6.20-rc6 and now I get a "unknown device: sda3" > error when I try to boot. > > I compiled 2.6.20-rc6 by copying over the .config from the 2.6.19 tree > and running a make oldconfig && make > > Am I doing something wrong? Both kernels are self-compiled or is 2.6.19 a distribution kernel? It could be that 2.6.20-rc6 has a bug and therefore no longer is able to use your controller. It's also possible that the enumeration changed (e.g. sda is now an external hard disk). During boot, there should be some messages prefixed with ata: and sda: describing what your kernel found and how it enumerated them. What do they print with 2.6.20-rc6? > Patrick cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <8d158e1f0701282330o3591a226lb664644ffdb025f0@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: Boot problems with pata_via driver [not found] ` <8d158e1f0701282330o3591a226lb664644ffdb025f0@mail.gmail.com> @ 2007-01-29 7:32 ` Patrick Ale 2007-01-29 20:53 ` Patrick Ale 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-29 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel On 1/29/07, Patrick Ale <patrick.ale@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/29/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:47:18PM +0100, Patrick Ale wrote: > > > > > Hi Patrick, > Morning! The 2.6.19 was self-compiled, using the gentoo-sources-rc4 AND using the vanilla 2.6.19 from kernel.org (I was recommended to use vanilla sources with my ATI drivers), both worked. 2.6.20 is self compiled to. I will give you the kernel output when I am at home, I will have to connect a serial cable to my laptop and use the scrollbuffer since on a kernel panic or system crash my keyboard leds start to blink, which the kernel sees as a device addressing hardware directly and giving me a kernel message for every blink :D Oh, and pata_via is the ONLY driver I have compiled built-in, regarding libsata. As I mentioned in previous mails I have quite some controllers and disks, but pata_via (my onboard IDE) has only two drives attaches, on IDE0 (in 2.6.19 ata0) my boot disk I also tried to boot with scsi_mod.scan=sync, this didnt work either More info follows, thanks for your time allready :) Patrick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Boot problems with pata_via driver 2007-01-29 7:32 ` Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-29 20:53 ` Patrick Ale 2007-01-29 21:01 ` Patrick Ale 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-29 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Okay so, I unplugged the keyboard the moment I selected a kernel to boot. The last thing i see on my screen, regarding SCSI is: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2000JB-00G 08.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 scsi 1:0:0:0 CD-ROM AOPEN DUW1608/ARR A060 PW: 0 ANSI: 5 then later on: VFS: Cannot open root device "sda3" or unknown-block(0,0) Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Boot problems with pata_via driver 2007-01-29 20:53 ` Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-29 21:01 ` Patrick Ale 2007-01-29 21:18 ` Patrick Ale 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-29 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel On 1/29/07, Patrick Ale <patrick.ale@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay so, I unplugged the keyboard the moment I selected a kernel to boot. > The last thing i see on my screen, regarding SCSI is: > > scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2000JB-00G 08.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 > scsi 1:0:0:0 CD-ROM AOPEN DUW1608/ARR A060 PW: 0 ANSI: 5 Funny, when I look at my dmesg log when I boot the 2.6.19 kernel (which works) then I seem to miss something in the kernel output when I boot the 2.6.20 kernel. When I boot 2.6.19 I see: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2000JB-00G 08.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 sda6 > sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0 Does 2.6.20 see my IDE bus but it doesnt probe for drives? Patrick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Boot problems with pata_via driver 2007-01-29 21:01 ` Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-29 21:18 ` Patrick Ale 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Patrick Ale @ 2007-01-29 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel On 1/29/07, Patrick Ale <patrick.ale@gmail.com> wrote: A lot of crap. And i am a fruitcake, nutter, headcase. *sigh* sorry for wasting your time, I found my problem. Since I thought libata worked like my old ata drivers and 2.6.19 was booting well, I reconfigured my kernel source and changed CONFIG_BLK_DEV=y to CONFIG_BLK_DEV=m, since I genuinely thought I wouldnt need additional disk drivers since I never needed them for IDE. I compiled the kernel and all but never copied over the bzImage over to /boot/ Now, I grabbed the config from 2.6.19 , copied it to 2.6.20, ran a make oldconfig && make && make_modules and copied the bzImage to /boot/. Of course, the 2.6.20 image I try to boot DOES contain the CONFIG_BLK_DEV=m , so it wont find any disks, since the module is not active (I dont use ramdisks). I reconfigured 2.6.20 with CONFIG_BLK_DEV=y , and its working now. idiot I am, what else can I say. Again, sorry for wasting your time. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-29 21:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-01-28 11:47 Boot problems with pata_via driver Patrick Ale 2007-01-28 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk [not found] ` <8d158e1f0701282330o3591a226lb664644ffdb025f0@mail.gmail.com> 2007-01-29 7:32 ` Patrick Ale 2007-01-29 20:53 ` Patrick Ale 2007-01-29 21:01 ` Patrick Ale 2007-01-29 21:18 ` Patrick Ale
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).