LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Gautham shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:13:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070129011301.GA844@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
For the beginning, about another (but related) minor problem,
debug_smp_processor_id:
/*
* Kernel threads bound to a single CPU can safely use
* smp_processor_id():
*/
This is only true without CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU. Otherwise CPU can go away when
the task takes a preemption or sleeps. I think we need #ifndef here.
Now,
static void __devinit start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
{
struct delayed_work *reap_work = &per_cpu(reap_work, cpu);
if (keventd_up() && reap_work->work.func == NULL) {
init_reap_node(cpu);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(reap_work, cache_reap);
schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, reap_work,
__round_jiffies_relative(HZ, cpu));
}
}
This is wrong. Suppose we have a CPU_UP,CPU_DOWN,CPU_UP sequence. The last
CPU_UP will not restart a per-cpu "cache_reap timer".
With or without recent changes, it is possible that work->func() will run on
another CPU (not that to which it was submitted) if CPU goes down. In fact,
this can happen while work->func() is running, so even smp_processor_id()
is not safe to use in work->func().
However, cache_reap() seems to wrongly assume that smp_processor_id() is stable,
this is the second problem.
Is my understanding correct?
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-29 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-29 1:13 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-01-29 16:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-29 17:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-29 17:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-29 18:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-29 19:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-29 19:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-29 19:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-29 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-29 20:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-29 21:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-29 21:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-29 22:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-20 18:39 ` Max Krasnyansky
2007-02-20 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-20 20:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-20 21:22 ` Max Krasnyansky
2007-02-20 21:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-20 22:01 ` Max Krasnyansky
2007-02-20 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-20 22:48 ` SLAB cache reaper on isolated cpus Max Krasnyansky
2007-02-20 23:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-21 3:41 ` Max Krasnyansky
2007-02-20 21:05 ` slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems Max Krasnyansky
2007-02-20 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070129011301.GA844@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--subject='Re: slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).