LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	vatsa@in.ibm.com, clameter@sgi.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:57:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070130135709.B32010@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070116113505.GA6294@elte.hu>; from mingo@elte.hu on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:35:05PM +0100

Sorry for the delayed response. I was away on vacation.

Please let me know if you still see this issue with the latest -rt kernel.

thanks,
suresh

On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:35:05PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Suresh,
> 
> on the latest -rt kernel, when the dynticks load-balancer is enabled, 
> then a dual-core Core2 Duo test-system increases its irq rate from the 
> normal 15/17 per second to 300-400/sec - on a completely idle system(!). 
> Any idea what's going on? I'll disable the load balancer for now.
> 
> 	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-30 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-11 23:53 Siddha, Suresh B
2006-12-13 22:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-13 23:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-13 23:03     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-12-13 23:31       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-13 23:19         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-12-14  0:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-19 20:12           ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-19 21:12             ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-01-16 11:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-30 21:57                 ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2007-02-07 22:19                   ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-02-17  2:03                   ` [patch 1/2] sched: fix idle load balancing in softirqd context Siddha, Suresh B
2007-02-17  2:08                     ` [patch 2/2] sched: dynticks idle load balancing - v2 Siddha, Suresh B
2007-02-21 20:23                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-22  3:14                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-24  2:01                         ` [patch] sched: dynticks idle load balancing - v3 Siddha, Suresh B
2007-02-22  3:26                       ` [patch 2/2] sched: dynticks idle load balancing - v2 Nick Piggin
2007-02-22 22:33                         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-02-23  3:43                           ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-17 14:42                     ` [patch 1/2] sched: fix idle load balancing in softirqd context Steven Rostedt
2007-02-21  6:25                       ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-02-21 20:13                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-13 23:48     ` [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing Ingo Molnar
2006-12-20  0:49 ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070130135709.B32010@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).