LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:09:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070201070930.GA26436@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75b66ecd0701312028w7866c608hbf70593055c92b19@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:28:07PM -0500, Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
> >1. Scheduling fairness.
> >Since kernel does not know about multiple threads behind given process,
> >it can not add it appropriate number of timeslices for execution.
> >Can be solved either by more tight collaboarion of the userspace and
> >kernelspace schedulers or simply by increasing process' nice value.
> 
> nice value is only meaningful for SCHED_OTHER.  How will you handle a
> multithreaded realtime application that uses SCHED_OTHER as well as
> SCHED_FIFO threads?

Threads created inside one process obviously can not compete with RT
threads created by other process. Instead process, which threads have RT
priority itself should change its priority to RT to compete with other
RT process. (By RT I mean any cases except SCHED_OTHER which is
default).

> Lee

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-01  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-29 14:52 Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-01-29 14:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-01-29 16:40 ` Chris Friesen
2007-01-30  9:46   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
     [not found] ` <40f323d00701290747y68c8e27ege824694bfa378f58@mail.gmail.com>
2007-01-30  1:18   ` Samuel Thibault
2007-01-30  9:53     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-01-30 10:24       ` Samuel Thibault
2007-01-30 10:43         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-01  4:28 ` Lee Revell
2007-02-01  7:09   ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2007-01-30 21:16 Kaz Kylheku
2007-01-31  8:47 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-02 16:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-03 15:26   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-04 20:12     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-04 20:20       ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-02-04 21:42         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-05  6:14           ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-14 12:17           ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-04 22:52         ` Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070201070930.GA26436@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --subject='Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).