LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	akuster@mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] PM: Adds remount fs ro at suspend
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:24:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070209222445.GB3949@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070207112539.GD8148@khazad-dum.debian.net>

On Wed 2007-02-07 09:25:39, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Ok, as far as usage scenario goes, that's fair enough. But as to the
> > solution, I wonder though whether it's making life more complicated than
> > it needs to be. After all, we should also be able to cope okay with
> > having the power suddenly go out. If we can cope with that, cleaning
> > filesystems prior to suspending should be a non-issue.
> 
> We don't cope okay with the power going out, at all.  And as an user case, a
> need for fsck if you do something that is a reasonable use case (unplugging
> devices while suspended) is not okay, either.

It would be nice to umount devices over suspend, but I do not think
solution is as easy as patch that started this thread. For now it is
'dont do that' and fsck is nice reminder that you done something
wrong.

							Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-09 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-02 23:50 akuster
2007-02-03  0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03  0:35   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-05 21:28     ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-05 21:35       ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-06 14:32       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-06 18:07         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-06 21:38         ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-07 11:25           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-07 11:43             ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-02-07 12:05               ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-07 14:10                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-09 22:24             ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-02-13 12:12         ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-03  0:57   ` akuster
2007-02-03 10:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-04  1:34   ` akuster
2007-02-05 16:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-14 11:07     ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-03 16:19 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070209222445.GB3949@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akuster@mvista.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --subject='Re: [patch 1/1] PM: Adds remount fs ro at suspend' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).