LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <>
Cc: linux-kernel <>,
	Andrew Morton <>, Adam Belay <>,
	Shaohua Li <>,
	Len Brown <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing cpuidle: core cpuidle infrastructure
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:22:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:39:25AM -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
 > Introducing 'cpuidle', a new CPU power management infrastructure to manage
 > idle CPUs in a clean and efficient manner.
 > cpuidle separates out the drivers that can provide support for multiple types
 > of idle states and policy governors that decide on what idle state to use
 > at run time.
 > A cpuidle driver can support multiple idle states based on parameters like
 > varying power consumption, wakeup latency, etc (ACPI C-states for example).
 > A cpuidle governor can be usage model specific (laptop, server,
 > laptop on battery etc).
 > Main advantage of the infrastructure being, it allows independent development
 > of drivers and governors and allows for better CPU power management.
 > A huge thanks to Adam Belay and Shaohua Li who were part of this mini-project
 > since its beginning and are greatly responsible for this patchset.

interesting.  Though I wonder about giving admins _more_ knobs to twiddle.
It took cpufreq a long time to settle down in this area, and typically
'ondemand' was the answer in the end for 99.9% of people.   I question the usefulness
for the whole multiple governors interface, because in the case of cpuidle
there shouldn't be any real trade-off between one algorithm and another afaics?
So why can't we just have one, that just 'does the right thing' ?
The only differentiator that I can think of would be latency, but that seems
to be a) covered in a different tunable, and b) probably wouldn't affect
most people enough where it matters.

I'll do a proper code review later, but one thing stuck out like a sore
thumb on a quick skim..

 > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(current_driver);

That's a horribly generic name for an exported global.

current_cpuidle_driver maybe?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-13  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-12 18:39 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2007-02-13  1:22 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-02-13  7:58   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-13 13:31   ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2007-02-14  4:10     ` Adam Belay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing cpuidle: core cpuidle infrastructure' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).