LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <>
To:, Andrew Morton <>,
	Al Viro <>,, Tony Jones <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Neil Brown <>, Christoph Hellwig <>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <>,
	walt <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:19:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Monday 05 February 2007 00:32, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Here is an updated patch that also catches this special case.
> [...]

The d_path change was to not start unreachable paths with slashes. In the 
extreme case, this leads to an empty string. As it turns out, we are 
reporting meaningless paths to users in a bunch of places in /proc, like 
in /proc/$pid/mounts, where we ended up with entries like this:

	rootfs  rootfs rw 0 0

No wonder this immediately broke things; sorry for that.

Mountpoints are reported relative to the chroot if they are reachable from the 
chroot, and relative to the namespace they are defined in otherwise. This is 
big nonsense, but it's unclear to me how to best fix it:

  - don't report unreachable mount points,
  - somehow indicate which mountpoints are reachable and which are not,
    like by prepending a question flag?

What's the point in reporting the rootfs at all -- it's never reachable to an 
ordinary process?

The same issue shows up in a few other places as well: /proc/$pid/mountstats 
which is similar to /proc/$pid/mounts, and here:


We surely do not want to hide the entries that have unreachable pathnames 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-14  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-03  3:23 Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-05  0:15 ` Neil Brown
2007-02-15  2:43   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-05  8:32 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-05 18:37   ` [PATCH]Add memory barrier before clear bit in unlock_buffer() Mingming Cao
2007-02-14  8:19   ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2007-02-14  8:29     ` [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts Olaf Hering
2007-02-14  8:42       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-14 15:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 19:39       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-14 22:57         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-15  3:13           ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-17 13:30             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-02-15 12:53           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-02-15 13:19             ` Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).