LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
Cc: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702161814.26855.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45D4FBB0.7090109@us.ibm.com>
On Friday 16 February 2007 01:32, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> config OPROFILE_CELL
> bool "OProfile for Cell Broadband Engine"
> depends on OPROFILE && SPU_FS
> default y if ((SPU_FS = y && OPROFILE = y) || (SPU_FS = m &&
> OPROFILE = m))
> help
> Profiling of Cell BE SPUs requires special support enabled
> by this option. Both SPU_FS and OPROFILE options must be
> set 'y' or both be set 'm'.
> =============
>
> Can anyone see a problem with any of this . . . or perhaps a suggestion
> of a better way?
The text suggests it doesn't allow SPU_FS=y with OPROFILE=m, which I think
should be allowed. I also don't see any place in the code where you actually
use CONFIG_OPROFILE_CELL.
Ideally, you should be able to have an oprofile_spu module that can be
loaded after spufs.ko and oprofile.ko. In that case you only need
config OPROFILE_SPU
depends on OPROFILE && SPU_FS
default y
and it will automatically build oprofile_spu as a module if one of the two
is a module and won't build it if one of them is disabled.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-16 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-14 23:52 Carl Love
2007-02-15 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 16:15 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-15 18:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 20:21 ` Carl Love
2007-02-15 21:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-16 0:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 0:32 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-16 17:14 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2007-02-16 21:43 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-18 23:18 ` Maynard Johnson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-22 0:02 Carl Love
2007-02-26 23:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-27 1:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-27 16:52 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-28 1:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-06 0:28 [RFC,PATCH] CELL PPU " Carl Love
2007-02-06 23:02 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL " Carl Love
2007-02-07 15:41 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-07 22:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-08 15:03 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 14:18 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 17:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-08 18:01 ` Adrian Reber
2007-02-08 22:51 ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 2:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 16:17 ` Carl Love
2007-02-11 22:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-12 16:38 ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 18:47 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-09 19:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 23:59 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-09 18:03 ` Milton Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702161814.26855.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--subject='Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).