LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Add the code maturity levels DEPRECATED and OBSOLETE.
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:35:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702181935.07454.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702181203360.5131@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6>


Hi,

Would it be possible to get this patch merged
(or at least DEPRECATED part of it)?

I think that the patch is useful and that the distinction between
DEPRECATED and OBSOLETE options is quite clear:

* DEPRECATED == new better code is available, old code scheduled for removal

* OBSOLETE == no replacement yet but the code is broken by design
  and unreliable, not scheduled for removal yet (BTW Robert, I think
  CONFIG_OBSOLETE should also be "default y", at least initially)

I would like to start using CONFIG_DEPRECATED and CONFIG_OBSOLETE
for some IDE config config options/features (not drivers) in the future.

Thanks,
Bart

On Sunday 18 February 2007 18:06, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   Add two new maturity levels of DEPRECATED and OBSOLETE to the kbuild
> structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>   one more time, i'll see if i can get this into the main tree, since
> previous attempts just seem to disappear into the void, even though
> several people seemed to think it was a good idea.
> 
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index a3f83e2..acc0052 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -29,9 +29,10 @@ config EXPERIMENTAL
>  	  <file:Documentation/BUG-HUNTING>, and
>  	  <file:Documentation/oops-tracing.txt> in the kernel source).
> 
> -	  This option will also make obsoleted drivers available. These are
> -	  drivers that have been replaced by something else, and/or are
> -	  scheduled to be removed in a future kernel release.
> +	  At the moment, this option also makes obsolete drivers available,
> +	  but such drivers really should be removed from the EXPERIMENTAL
> +	  category and added to either DEPRECATED or OBSOLETE, depending
> +	  on their status.
> 
>  	  Unless you intend to help test and develop a feature or driver that
>  	  falls into this category, or you have a situation that requires
> @@ -40,6 +41,29 @@ config EXPERIMENTAL
>  	  you say Y here, you will be offered the choice of using features or
>  	  drivers that are currently considered to be in the alpha-test phase.
> 
> +config DEPRECATED
> +	bool "Prompt for deprecated code/drivers"
> +	default y
> +	---help---
> +	  Code that is tagged as "deprecated" is officially still available
> +	  for use but will typically have already been scheduled for removal
> +	  at some point, so it's in your best interests to start looking for
> +	  an alternative.
> +
> +	  Check the file Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt to see
> +	  if a particular feature has an official scheduled removal date.
> +
> +config OBSOLETE
> +	bool "Prompt for obsolete code/drivers"
> +	default n
> +	---help---
> +	  Code that is tagged as "obsolete" is officially no longer supported
> +	  and shouldn't play a part in any normal build, but those features
> +	  might still be available if you absolutely need access to them.
> +
> +	  You are *strongly* discouraged from continuing to depend on
> +	  obsolete code on an ongoing, long-term basis.
> +
>  config BROKEN
>  	bool

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-18 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-18 17:06 Robert P. J. Day
2007-02-18 18:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2007-02-18 18:53   ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-02-20 16:27   ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-20 18:42     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-02-20 22:52       ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-02-20 23:12         ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-20 23:23           ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-02-25 10:42           ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-25 22:59             ` Tilman Schmidt
2007-02-20 22:47     ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-02-20 22:56       ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-20 23:01         ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702181935.07454.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Add the code maturity levels DEPRECATED and OBSOLETE.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).