From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1751037AbXBUBdh@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751037AbXBUBdh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:33:37 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751040AbXBUBdh
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:33:37 -0500
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:33052 "EHLO
	ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751037AbXBUBdg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:33:36 -0500
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
        b=PyWNhUbd2z32UPnfNILTf7FL5hZ2olkU9VUpA1jJh/9OzCUhmCnq+z+Z7/CyyYEDKmVj+8eE7HFSo62PiTDxyd81QaZ55XScR4QfgVO6TxgRBn2ZTNr01ShnaMLw3h4JoVzVsLE6NlKlfJPaPJ4VuGYboKVXryCsHv69ou+AVrM=
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] deprecated/obsolete patch
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:39:41 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702201818580.11849@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702201818580.11849@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200702210239.41641.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On Wednesday 21 February 2007 00:20, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   here's a slightly revised wording, if that makes it clearer:

I think that it does explain things better and I hope that some form
of consensus can be finally reached.

Thanks,
Bart