From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751951AbXB0WYl (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:24:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751952AbXB0WYl (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:24:41 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:2776 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951AbXB0WYk (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:24:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:24:30 +0000 From: Russell King To: Andrew Morton , Ian Molton Cc: Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] udivdi3: 64 bit divide Message-ID: <20070227222430.GC10380@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , Ian Molton , Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070226173517.66bf0fec@freekitty> <20070227122437.da27c3cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070227131840.672d6932@localhost> <20070227133656.c452fbb4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070227133656.c452fbb4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:36:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:18:40 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Then we should pull the existing udivdi3 implementations? > > Not much point really. Some architectures have gone and done that, but x86 > has not. x86 has enough coverage for us to pick up most problems, and any > remaining problems are obviously in scruffy architectures which don't care > about performance ;) I doubt arm26 uses udivdi3, but that's something Ian would have to confirm. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: