LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>,
	Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Mike Perks <mperks@us.ibm.com>,
	oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:44:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702280244.12844.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45E461D4.6050807@us.ibm.com>

On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> I have applied the "cleanup" patch that Arnd sent, but had to fix up a 
> few things:
>    -  Bug fix:  Initialize retval in spu_task_sync.c, line 95, otherwise 
> OProfile this function returns non-zero and OProfile fails.
>    -  Remove unused codes in include/linux/oprofile.h
>    -  Compile warnings:  Initialize offset and spu_cookie at lines 283 
> and 284 in spu_task_sync.c
> 
> With these changes and some userspace changes that were necessary to 
> correspond with Arnd's changes, our testing was successful.
> 
> A fixup patch is attached.
> 

The patch does not contain any of the metadata I need to apply it
(subject, description, signed-off-by).

> @@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ static int process_context_switch(struct
>  {
>         unsigned long flags;
>         int retval;
> -       unsigned int offset;
> -       unsigned long spu_cookie, app_dcookie;
> +       unsigned int offset = 0;
> +       unsigned long spu_cookie = 0, app_dcookie;
>         retval = prepare_cached_spu_info(spu, objectId);
>         if (retval)
>                 goto out;

No, this is wrong. Leaving the variables uninitialized at least warns
you about the bug you have in this function: when there is anything wrong,
you just continue writing the record with zero offset and dcookie values
in it. Instead, you should get handle the error condition somewhere
down the code.

It's harmless most of the time, but you really should not be painting
over your bugs by blindly initializing variables.

> diff -paur linux-orig/include/linux/oprofile.h linux-new/include/linux/oprofile.h
> --- linux-orig/include/linux/oprofile.h 2007-02-27 14:41:29.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-new/include/linux/oprofile.h  2007-02-27 14:43:18.000000000 -0600
> @@ -36,9 +36,6 @@
>  #define XEN_ENTER_SWITCH_CODE          10
>  #define SPU_PROFILING_CODE             11
>  #define SPU_CTX_SWITCH_CODE            12
> -#define SPU_OFFSET_CODE                13
> -#define SPU_COOKIE_CODE                14
> -#define SPU_SHLIB_COOKIE_CODE          15
>  
>  struct super_block;
>  struct dentry;
> 
Right, I forgot about this.

	Arnd <><


  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-28  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-22  0:02 Carl Love
2007-02-26 23:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-27  1:31   ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-27 16:52   ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-28  1:44     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-14 23:52 Carl Love
2007-02-15 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 16:15   ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-15 18:13     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 20:21   ` Carl Love
2007-02-15 21:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 21:50     ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-16  0:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16  0:32   ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-16 17:14     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 21:43       ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-18 23:18         ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-06  0:28 [RFC,PATCH] CELL PPU " Carl Love
2007-02-06 23:02 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL " Carl Love
2007-02-07 15:41   ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-07 22:48     ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-08 15:03       ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 14:18   ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 17:21     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-08 18:01       ` Adrian Reber
2007-02-08 22:51       ` Carl Love
2007-02-09  2:46         ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 16:17           ` Carl Love
2007-02-11 22:46             ` Milton Miller
2007-02-12 16:38               ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 18:47       ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 19:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-09 19:46           ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 23:59     ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-09 18:03       ` Milton Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702280244.12844.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mperks@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --subject='Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).