LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidle take2: Core cpuidle infrastructure
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:59:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070228065932.GA23678@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB12A50964762B4D8111D55B764A845401540255@scsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:47:55PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >I played with this a little, and got puzzled.
> >My quad core box used exactly the same amount of power whether the
> >'ladder' governer was loaded & in use or not. In both situations
> >it was exactly the same as a vanilla 2.6.20
> >
> >I'd have expected it to use more until I loaded up 'ladder' to bring it
> >on par featurewise with 2.6.20. What did I miss?
>
> Quad core what platform?
Glenwood
> How many C-states are supported in this platform?
Garg, only C1. That explains a lot.
> Current ladder is mostly like Policy embedded in ACPI today. But, Adam
> has
> been working on different policies that we want to experiment with as we
> go along.
ok.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-28 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-22 21:52 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2007-02-27 16:44 ` Dave Jones
2007-02-28 4:47 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-02-28 6:59 ` Dave Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070228065932.GA23678@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=abelay@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidle take2: Core cpuidle infrastructure' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).