LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidle take2: Core cpuidle infrastructure
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:59:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070228065932.GA23678@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB12A50964762B4D8111D55B764A845401540255@scsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:47:55PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:

 > >I played with this a little, and got puzzled.
 > >My quad core box used exactly the same amount of power whether the
 > >'ladder' governer was loaded & in use or not.  In both situations
 > >it was exactly the same as a vanilla 2.6.20
 > >
 > >I'd have expected it to use more until I loaded up 'ladder' to bring it
 > >on par featurewise with 2.6.20.  What did I miss?
 > 
 > Quad core what platform?

Glenwood

 > How many C-states are supported in this platform?

Garg, only C1.  That explains a lot.

 > Current ladder is mostly like Policy embedded in ACPI today. But, Adam
 > has
 > been working on different policies that we want to experiment with as we
 > go along.

ok.

		Dave


-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

      reply	other threads:[~2007-02-28  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-22 21:52 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2007-02-27 16:44 ` Dave Jones
2007-02-28  4:47   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-02-28  6:59     ` Dave Jones [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070228065932.GA23678@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=abelay@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidle take2: Core cpuidle infrastructure' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).