LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: replace system timer with work queue
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:35:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070228233512.d2d275a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702281000050.9439@tm8103-a.perex-int.cz>
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:12:01 +0100 (CET) Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please, review and apply to mm tree for further testing. The patch
> is also available at
> ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/kernel-patches/bonding-workqueue.patch .
Please cc netdev@vger.kernel.org on net-related patches, thanks.
> Thank you,
> Jaroslav
>
> ==================
> bonding: replace system timer with work queue
>
> This patch replaces system timer with work queue in monitor functions.
> The reason for this change is that bonding handlers calls various
> sleeping functions from the timer handler which is not allowed.
Which sleeping functions? I'd have expected the kernel to spew runtime
warnings when this happens, but I don't recall any such reports.
> Because we cannot share the main workqueue threads (rtnl_lock is used
> also in linkwatch_event) - new bond workqueue thread is created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>
>
> diff -rupN linux-2.6.20.orig/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> --- linux-2.6.20.orig/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c 2007-02-04 19:44:54.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c 2007-02-28 09:19:43.831369202 +0100
> @@ -2097,8 +2097,10 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave
> * times out, and it selects an aggregator for the ports that are yet not
> * related to any aggregator, and selects the active aggregator for a bond.
> */
> -void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct bonding *bond)
> +void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> + struct ad_bond_info *ad_info = container_of(work, struct ad_bond_info, ad_work.work);
> + struct bonding *bond = (struct bonding *)((char *)ad_info - offsetof(struct bonding, ad_info));
We can use containers_of here too?
> -void bond_alb_monitor(struct bonding *bond)
> +void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> - struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
> + struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = container_of(work, struct alb_bond_info, alb_work.work);
> + struct bonding *bond = (struct bonding *)((char *)bond_info - offsetof(struct bonding, alb_info));
And here.
> + cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(bond_wq, &(BOND_AD_INFO(bond).ad_work));
> break;
> case BOND_MODE_TLB:
> case BOND_MODE_ALB:
> - del_timer_sync(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).alb_timer));
> + cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(bond_wq, &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).alb_work));
> break;
> default:
> break;
> @@ -4289,6 +4272,14 @@ static int bond_init(struct net_device *
> rwlock_init(&bond->lock);
> rwlock_init(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>
> + /* initialize work */
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bond->mii_work, (void *)&bond_mii_monitor);
> + if (params->mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bond->arp_work, (void *)&bond_activebackup_arp_mon);
> + } else {
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bond->arp_work, (void *)&bond_loadbalance_arp_mon);
> + }
Can we lose the unneeded braces, the unneeded typecasts and fit the code
into 80 cols?
<does all that>
yup.
> bond->params = *params; /* copy params struct */
>
> /* Initialize pointers */
> @@ -4782,6 +4773,12 @@ static int __init bonding_init(void)
> goto err;
> }
>
> + bond_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("bond");
> + if (bond_wq == NULL) {
> + res = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> res = bond_create_sysfs();
> if (res)
> goto err;
> @@ -4807,6 +4804,7 @@ static void __exit bonding_exit(void)
>
> rtnl_lock();
> bond_free_all();
> + destroy_workqueue(bond_wq);
> bond_destroy_sysfs();
> rtnl_unlock();
Are you sure that all pending delayed works have been cancelled when we
destroy this workqueue?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-01 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-28 9:12 Jaroslav Kysela
2007-02-28 22:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 7:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-03-01 16:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-01 17:00 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070228233512.d2d275a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] bonding: replace system timer with work queue' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).