From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965160AbXCAPNZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:13:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965171AbXCAPNZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:13:25 -0500 Received: from smtp.bulldogdsl.com ([212.158.248.8]:4706 "EHLO mcr-smtp-002.bulldogdsl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965160AbXCAPNY (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:13:24 -0500 X-Spam-Abuse: Please report all spam/abuse matters to abuse@bulldogdsl.com From: Alistair John Strachan To: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: CK804 SATA Errors (still got them) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:13:15 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200703011339.52895.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <45E6E701.6000600@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <45E6E701.6000600@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703011513.15179.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 01 March 2007 14:45, Robert Hancock wrote: > This one seems a bit different. This time it's not related to NCQ vs. > non-NCQ (this is a non-NCQ write here), it's in ADMA mode (so it's > presumably not related to switching between ADMA and register mode, > unless perhaps a flush cache or something executed just before), and > from the CPB data it appears the command completed but the controller's > registers aren't indicating that it has. Not sure if I've seen one like > that before.. > > How easily can you reproduce this? It's the first one since -rc2, so apparently not easily. I'm more than willing to find loads that expose it, though, so I might try that this afternoon. -- Cheers, Alistair. Final year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.