LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] implement __attribute_discard_text/data__ and use it to leave out PM functions if !CONFIG_PM
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:21:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070310082124.GA6771@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070305033819.GA32687@htj.dyndns.org>
Hi!
> This patch is the result from the following discussion.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/16475
>
> The problem is that CONFIG_PM affects a lot of low level drivers and
> scattering CONFIG_PM all over the place is too ugly. This patch...
>
> * implements __attribute_discard_text__ and __attribute_discard_data__
> (not implemented for modules yet, only for built-ins)
> * uses them to implement __pm and __pmdata markers
> * convert libata midlayer and ahci to use it instead of CONFIG_PM
>
> __attribute_discard_text/data__ puts the marked symbols in separate
> sections which are located from VMA 0 and discarded when generating
> the final image. It's similar to putting those into /DISCARD/ section
> but won't complain even if the discarded symbols are referenced by
> active sections. As the discard sections are located from VMA 0,
> actually dereferencing such symbols will result in OOPS.
>
> This trick certainly makes LLDs cleaner but there are also some
> downsides, so here are the cons.
>
> * Cannot depend on the compiler to detect illegal dereferences to
> discarded symbols. We probably can do this using sparse.
>
> * Cannot use the compiler to detect unused but unmarked symbols. This
> also probably can be done with sparse.
>
> * EXPORT_SYMBOL() is nullified, so it will take extra bytes for
> each symbol marked with __pm. (insignificant)
>
> * Implementation involves modifying kernel image, module build process
> and possibly sparse. It might be too expensive to achieve device
> driver prettiness, but there are a lot of device drivers out there
> and a lot of CONFIG_PM's to be added. Also, discard attributes can
> be used for other purposes too.
>
> Any better ideas? Comments?
Seems ok to me. Certainly better than config_pm...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-10 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-05 3:38 Tejun Heo
2007-03-10 8:21 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070310082124.GA6771@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH/RFC] implement __attribute_discard_text/data__ and use it to leave out PM functions if '\!'CONFIG_PM' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).