LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [2.6.20] BUG: workqueue leaked lock
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:49:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070316144921.GB5877@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070315191749.GS31960@vanheusden.com>

On 15-03-2007 20:17, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:50:14 +0100 Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> [ 1756.728209] BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: nfsd4/0x00000000/3577
> ...
>>> [ 1846.684023]  [<c1003bdb>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>> Oleg, that's a fairly incomprehensible message we have in there.  Can you
>> please explain what it means?
> 
> Haha ok :-)
> 
> Good, since I run 2.6.20 with these debugging switches switched on, I
> get occasionally errors like these. I get ALWAYS the following error
> when the system first boots when the TOR executable is started:
> 
> [  137.324255] =======================================================
> [  137.324359] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [  137.324412] 2.6.20 #2
> [  137.324457] -------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

IMHO you should now switch off lockdep ("Lock debuging: ..." options),
until you update or get some patch for this circular problem.  Your
logs should be sufficient to nfsd people and lockdep turns off checking
after this anyway. I don't know if this is a known and real locking
problem, but it could be interesting now, if workqueue error would
reapear. It seems nfsd code is breaking somewhere with locks held -
maybe because of problems with lockdep's error handling.

Regards,
Jarek P.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-16 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-13 16:50 Folkert van Heusden
2007-03-15 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-15 19:17   ` Folkert van Heusden
2007-03-16 14:49     ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-03-20 11:17     ` dquot.c: possible circular locking " Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 11:22       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 11:31         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 12:19           ` Jan Kara
2007-03-20 13:35             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-03-20 14:21               ` Jan Kara
2007-03-20 14:18                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-03-20 13:44             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 14:00               ` Jan Kara
2007-03-16  8:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-16 11:39     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-19  6:24       ` Neil Brown
2007-03-20  9:37         ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 16:07           ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-21  8:05             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-21 14:46               ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-21 15:16                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-21 15:17                   ` Folkert van Heusden
2007-03-21 15:29                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-21 18:16                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-22  6:11                       ` [PATCH] lockdep: lockdep_depth vs. debug_locks " Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22  6:28                         ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-22  7:06                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22  7:23                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22  7:13                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22  8:26                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22  6:57                         ` [PATCH] lockdep: debug_show_all_locks & debug_show_held_locks vs. debug_locks Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22  7:23                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-22  9:06                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-22  7:22                         ` [PATCH] lockdep: lockdep_depth vs. debug_locks Re: [2.6.20] BUG: workqueue leaked lock Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-22  9:06                           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070316144921.GB5877@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=folkert@vanheusden.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --subject='Re: [2.6.20] BUG: workqueue leaked lock' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).