From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752006AbXCTWKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:10:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752004AbXCTWKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:10:40 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:52436 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752006AbXCTWKi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:10:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:10:32 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: kernel list , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: "reboot" swsusp mode leaves moon icon blinking Message-ID: <20070320221032.GM3545@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070320123245.GA19019@elf.ucw.cz> <200703201805.58299.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070320172023.GA2593@elf.ucw.cz> <200703202203.27009.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703202203.27009.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Yes, we could do that. > > > > OTOH, we could simply avoid calling the platform code in resume > > path. It worked ok for a long while, and it seems to have no > > downsides... > > No, we have always done it, actually, but not in this particular place. ;-) > > In theory, avoiding it could be problematic, because of the pm_ops->finish() > that gets called after the image has been restored (if the platform mode was > used for suspending). Still, I think we can try. If we can return to the method "how we did it in 2.6.20", that would indeed be preffered ;-). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html