LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"J\. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: debug_show_all_locks & debug_show_held_locks vs. debug_locks
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:57:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070322065759.GB1466@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070322061119.GA1466@ff.dom.local>
And here is some addition.
[PATCH] lockdep: debug_show_all_locks & debug_show_held_locks vs. debug_locks
lockdep's data shouldn't be used when debug_locks == 0
because it's not updated after this, so it's more misleading
than helpful.
PS: probably lockdep's current-> fields should be reset after
it turns debug_locks off: so, after printing a bug report, but
before return from exported functions, but there are really
a lot of these possibilities (e.g. after DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON),
so, something could be missed. (Of course direct use of this
fields isn't recommended either.)
Reported-by: Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>
Inspired-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
---
diff -Nurp 2.6.21-rc4-git4-/kernel/lockdep.c 2.6.21-rc4-git4/kernel/lockdep.c
--- 2.6.21-rc4-git4-/kernel/lockdep.c 2007-03-21 22:46:26.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.21-rc4-git4/kernel/lockdep.c 2007-03-21 23:05:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -2742,6 +2742,10 @@ void debug_show_all_locks(void)
int count = 10;
int unlock = 1;
+ if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) {
+ printk("INFO: lockdep is turned off.\n");
+ return;
+ }
printk("\nShowing all locks held in the system:\n");
/*
@@ -2785,6 +2789,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_show_all_locks);
void debug_show_held_locks(struct task_struct *task)
{
+ if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) {
+ printk("INFO: lockdep is turned off.\n");
+ return;
+ }
lockdep_print_held_locks(task);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-13 16:50 [2.6.20] BUG: workqueue leaked lock Folkert van Heusden
2007-03-15 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-15 19:17 ` Folkert van Heusden
2007-03-16 14:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 11:17 ` dquot.c: possible circular locking " Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 11:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 11:31 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 12:19 ` Jan Kara
2007-03-20 13:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-03-20 14:21 ` Jan Kara
2007-03-20 14:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-03-20 13:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 14:00 ` Jan Kara
2007-03-16 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-16 11:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-19 6:24 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-20 9:37 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-20 16:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-21 8:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-21 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-21 15:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-21 15:17 ` Folkert van Heusden
2007-03-21 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-21 18:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-22 6:11 ` [PATCH] lockdep: lockdep_depth vs. debug_locks " Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22 6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-22 7:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22 7:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22 7:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22 8:26 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-22 6:57 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-03-22 7:23 ` [PATCH] lockdep: debug_show_all_locks & debug_show_held_locks vs. debug_locks Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-22 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-22 7:22 ` [PATCH] lockdep: lockdep_depth vs. debug_locks Re: [2.6.20] BUG: workqueue leaked lock Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-22 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070322065759.GB1466@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=folkert@vanheusden.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] lockdep: debug_show_all_locks & debug_show_held_locks vs. debug_locks' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).