LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <>
To: (Cliff Wickman)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpusets/sched_domain reconciliation
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:21:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:14:35 -0600 (Cliff Wickman) wrote:

> This patch reconciles cpusets and sched_domains that get out of sync
> due to disabling and re-enabling of cpu's.

I get three-out-of-three rejects in cpuset.c.  I could fix them, but I
wouldn't be very confident that the result works at runtime.  2.6.20-rc6 was
a long time ago - please, always raise patches against the latest mainline
kernel (the daily git snapshot suffices).

Recursion is a big no-no in kernel.  Is there any way in which it can be
avoided?  Is Dinakar's implementation also recursive?

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-22 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-20 19:14 Cliff Wickman
2007-03-22 21:21 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-03-22 22:39   ` Cliff Wickman
2007-03-22 22:32     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-23  5:07       ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpusets/sched_domain reconciliation' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).