LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] only allow nonlinear vmas for ram backed filesystems
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:51:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070325155127.GR10459@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1174824752.5149.28.camel@lappy>

On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 23:09 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> > 
> > Dirty page accounting/limiting doesn't work for nonlinear mappings, so
> > for non-ram backed filesystems emulate with linear mappings.  This
> > retains ABI compatibility with previous kernels at minimal code cost.
> > 
> > All known users of nonlinear mappings actually use tmpfs, so this
> > shouldn't have any negative effect.

They do? I thought the whole point of nonlinear mappings was for
mapping files bigger than the address space (eg. databases). Is Oracle
instead using this to map >3G files on a tmpfs??

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-25 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-24 22:07 [patch 1/3] split mmap Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-24 22:09 ` [patch 2/3] only allow nonlinear vmas for ram backed filesystems Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-25 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-25 15:51     ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-03-27  0:02       ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-26  0:00   ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-26  6:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-24 22:11 ` [patch 3/3] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-25 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-25 21:08     ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-03-25 12:12 ` [patch 1/3] split mmap Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070325155127.GR10459@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --subject='Re: [patch 2/3] only allow nonlinear vmas for ram backed filesystems' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).