LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 12/13] signal/timer/event fds v10 - eventfd wire up x86_64 arch ...
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:19:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070427141941.a7891c62.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <send-serie.davidel@xmailserver.org.10599.1175553997.12>
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:46:31 -0700
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
> This patch wire the eventfd system call to the x86_64 architecture.
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S 2007-04-02 15:06:40.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S 2007-04-02 15:06:46.000000000 -0700
> @@ -721,4 +721,5 @@
> .quad sys_epoll_pwait
> .quad sys_signalfd /* 320 */
> .quad sys_timerfd
> + .quad sys_eventfd
> ia32_syscall_end:
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds.orig/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h 2007-04-02 15:06:40.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h 2007-04-02 15:06:46.000000000 -0700
> @@ -623,8 +623,10 @@
> __SYSCALL(__NR_signalfd, sys_signalfd)
> #define __NR_timerfd 281
> __SYSCALL(__NR_timerfd, sys_timerfd)
> +#define __NR_eventfd 282
> +__SYSCALL(__NR_eventfd, sys_eventfd)
>
> -#define __NR_syscall_max __NR_timerfd
> +#define __NR_syscall_max __NR_eventfd
>
> #ifndef __NO_STUBS
> #define __ARCH_WANT_OLD_READDIR
General point: the first hunk here which wires up the 32-bit entry point
should arguably be part of the "wire up i386" patch, not the "wire up
x86_64" patch.
This is not a clear-cut thing. The problem with the approach you've taken
here is that if we wire up i386 and not x86_64's i386 table (for example)
there are ways in which intervening patches can accidentally get i386 and
x86_64 emulation's syscall tables out of sync. And, of course, 32-bit
applications will run on i386 but won't run on x86_64 or vice-versa.
So I think the best way to avoid all such problems is to always wire up
i386 and x86_64 (both 32- and 64-bit) in the same patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-27 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-02 22:46 Davide Libenzi
2007-04-27 21:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-27 21:37 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070427141941.a7891c62.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
--subject='Re: [patch 12/13] signal/timer/event fds v10 - eventfd wire up x86_64 arch ...' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).