From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755359AbXD0FpZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:45:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755357AbXD0FpZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:45:25 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:35247 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755344AbXD0FpQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:45:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:45:30 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: LKML Cc: Linux-MM , AKPM , Christoph Lameter , Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com Subject: [PATCH] change global zonelist order v4 [0/2] Message-Id: <20070427144530.ae42ee25.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Organization: Fujitsu X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, this is version 4. including Lee Schermerhon's good rework. and automatic configuration at boot time. (This patch is reworked from V2, so skip V3 changelog.) ChangeLog V2 -> V4 - automatic configuration is added. - automatic configuration is now default. - relaxed_zone_order is renamed to be numa_zonelist_order you can specify value "default" , "zone" , "numa" - clean-up from Lee Schermerhorn - patch is speareted to "base" and "autoconfiguration algorithm" Changelog from V1 -> V2 - sysctl name is changed to be relaxed_zone_order - NORMAL->NORMAL->....->DMA->DMA->DMA order (new ordering) is now default. NORMAL->DMA->NORMAL->DMA order (old ordering) is optional. - addes boot opttion to set relaxed_zone_order. ia64 is supported now. - Added documentation Please don't hesitate to rework this if you have good plan. I'll be offlined in the next week because my office will be closed. Lee-san, please Ack or Sign-Off if patches seems O.K. I think my autoconfiguration logic is reasonable to some extent. But we may have some discussion. It can be rewritable by additional patch easily. Thanks. -Kame