LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yokota Hiroshi <yokota@netlab.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>,
	GOTO Masanori <gotom@sanori.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: remove kernel 2.4 code
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:01:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070427150124.GU3468@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704271051240.22643@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:55:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> > Personally, I don't like to see 2.4 and 2.6 in a new driver, and
> > will tend to try to force it to be 2.6 only.  For an existing
> > driver, I tend to be much more tolerant: removing the huge gobs of
> > code to achieve 2.6 only is usually a bit disruptive on both the
> > driver and the maintainer
> >
> > > But if a driver is no longer actually maintained for both kernels
> > > these checks become useless (and there quickly arised
> > > unconditional 2.6-only code in such a driver) and can be removed.
> >
> > This driver is maintained by
> >
> > Yokota Hiroshi <yokota@netlab.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp>
> > GOTO Masanori <gotom@sanori.org>
> >
> > As it says in the header.  It was last modified in May 2006, so it
> > is maintained under the somewhat elastic standards of SCSI.  I've
> > cc'd them to see what they think.
> 
> while we're on the subject, what's the policy on supporting kernel
> version selection *within* the 2.5 series?  as in:
> 
> $ grep -r "KERNEL_VERSION(2,5" *
> drivers/scsi/pcmcia/nsp_cs.h:#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,74))
> drivers/scsi/pcmcia/nsp_cs.c:#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,0))
> drivers/scsi/pcmcia/nsp_cs.c:#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,2))
> drivers/scsi/pcmcia/nsp_cs.c:#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE > KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,73))
> ... etc etc ...
> 
> granted, this doesn't happen in a lot of files (almost of them
> SCSI-related), but is it official policy to support code based on its
> release number in the 2.5 series of releases?  unless you have a good
> reason, wouldn't it make more sense to compare against (2,6,0) rather
> than, say, (2,5,73)?  just an observation.

Besides the fact that I sent a patch to remove the compat code from this 
driver, it simply doesn't matter whether to compare with (2,5,73) or 
(2,6,0), so there's no reason for changing it.

> rday

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-27 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-26 23:47 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-26 23:59 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-27  0:13   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-27  0:30     ` James Bottomley
2007-04-27  4:26       ` GOTO Masanori
2007-04-27 14:55       ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-27 15:01         ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-26  4:08 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070427150124.GU3468@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gotom@sanori.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=yokota@netlab.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp \
    --subject='Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/scsi/nsp32.c: remove kernel 2.4 code' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).