LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland McGrath <>
To: Andrew Morton <>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move sig_kernel_* et al macros to linux/signal.h
Date: Fri,  4 May 2007 12:43:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Andrew Morton's message of  Friday, 4 May 2007 01:10:03 -0700 <>

> Should we undef rt_sigmask and siginmask after using them here?

They are used in macros, so "after" using them doesn't happen inside the file.
To do this sig_kernel_* would have to be redefined as inlines.
That should be fine AFAIK, but I hadn't intended to perturb it like that.


      reply	other threads:[~2007-05-04 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30  4:02 Roland McGrath
2007-05-04  8:10 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 19:43   ` Roland McGrath [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] Move sig_kernel_* et al macros to linux/signal.h' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).