LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru>
To: Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shem Multinymous <multinymous@gmail.com>,
	kernel-discuss@handhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:50:55 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070506215055.GA10538@zarina> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67630751.20070505172956@gmail.com>

Hi Paul,

On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:29:56PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Anton,
> 
>         But in real world, it's rather common to colloquially name
> such kind of power "AC", and that's "term" is known to many-many
> people, and intuitively understood even for those, who didn't hit it yet.
> Actually, this discussion is good confirmation that's the case -
> people understand in what meaning it is used here, and go to point
> that it's not "scientifically" correct.

I fully agree here. Yes, AC is common term, but might be really
confusing for people who really know what AC is. ;-)

In past review we tried to drop any point of confusions (we agreed to
separate capacity, charge and energy terms), and now we've found
another point: AC, DC, MAINS. So, let's again eliminate any possibility
of confusion, and name things with correct terms.


Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-06 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-03 21:31 Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-03 22:14 ` [Kernel-discuss] " ian
2007-05-03 22:55   ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-03 22:53 ` Greg KH
2007-05-03 23:08   ` CaT
2007-05-03 23:54   ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-04  4:55 ` Shem Multinymous
2007-05-05  3:54   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-05-05 12:32     ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-05 13:39       ` [Kernel-discuss] " pHilipp Zabel
2007-05-05 18:50         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 21:13         ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-05 14:29       ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-05 14:39         ` Damien Tournoud
2007-05-06 21:50         ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2007-05-05 13:46     ` ian
2007-05-05 14:06       ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-06 18:06         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-05-06 21:38           ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-06 18:09       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-05-06 21:07         ` Anton Vorontsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070506215055.GA10538@zarina \
    --to=cbou@mail.ru \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=kernel-discuss@handhelds.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=multinymous@gmail.com \
    --cc=pmiscml@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).