LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: oprofile broken in 2.6.21 SMP (was Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:12:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514201232.ad4768f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070513203816.GI30571@kvack.org>
On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:38:16 -0400 Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Hmm, after a opcontrol --reset i see the same issue now. Don't know what's
> > wrong, but it must be something different from the .20 perfctr allocation
> > problem.
> >
> > It looks like the daemon doesn't get any data from the kernel
>
> I finally had time to track this down. The breakage is caused by "[PATCH]
> x86-64: Let oprofile reserve MSR on all CPUs". Oprofile is already calling
> the reserve functions on each CPU in the system when it sets up the MSRs.
> This results in oprofile getting a reservation failure on CPUs above 0. The
> following makes oprofile adapt to the API change for now -- oprofile
> still needs to be modified to perform the reservations earlier during its
> initialization, but that's a little bit more involved than the immediate
> bug fix. This only affects systems with more than 1 CPU. This patch has
> been through limited testing (Athlon 64 X2 and Core 2, but not on the P4) on
> x86 and x86-64 (Core 2 only).
Unfortunately we've left this a bit too late - your patch is patching code which
isn't there any more in mainline and we also need a 2.6.21.x fix.
So perhaps we could merge your "immediate bugfix" into -stable and implement the
"more involved" fix for 2.6.22.
Andi, any preferences?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-15 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-04 3:08 Remove constructor from buffer_head Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 3:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 3:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 4:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 6:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-04 16:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 23:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-04 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-05 9:31 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-13 20:38 ` oprofile broken in 2.6.21 SMP (was Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head) Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-15 3:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-04 21:42 ` Remove constructor from buffer_head Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 21:52 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070514201232.ad4768f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: oprofile broken in 2.6.21 SMP (was Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head)' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).