From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757665AbXGCGAI (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 02:00:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752058AbXGCF74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:59:56 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([209.217.80.40]:58540 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751479AbXGCF74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:59:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:59:15 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Yinghai Lu Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node Message-ID: <20070703055915.GA19086@kroah.com> References: <200706291326.43563.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <200707021537.13840.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <20070703051336.GF18420@kroah.com> <86802c440707022217w40d67b40o9f533a1f93b4807f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440707022217w40d67b40o9f533a1f93b4807f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:17:56PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 7/2/07, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:37:13PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > [PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node > > > > Um, your subject doesn't match the patch below. You might want to > > verify it again... > > > > it should be > > [PATCH 4/4] usb: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node On the linux-usb-devel list we are discussing how usb_alloc_urb is being reworked to look totally different, so this change will conflict with that. Also, any real numbers to justify these changes? I know how slow USB really is and I'd be supprised if this matters. thanks, greg k-h