LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	k-miyoshi@cb.jp.nec.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] add kdump_after_notifier
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:02:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070726153240.GA15969@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070726140702.GA8949@suse.de>

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:07:02PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com> [2007-07-19 14:15]:
> > 
> > In latest kernel, we can't use panic_notifier_list if kdump is enabled.
> > panic_notifier_list is very useful function for debug, failover, etc...
> > 
> > So this patch adds a control file /proc/sys/kernel/dump_after_notifier
> > and resolves a problem users can not use both kdump and panic_notifier_list
> > at the same time.
> > 
> > kdump_after_notifier = 0
> >  -> panic()
> >     -> crash_kexec(NULL)
> > 
> > kdump_after_notifier = 1
> >  -> panic()
> >     -> atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
> >     -> crash_kexec(NULL)
> 
> What's problematic about this patch? I also would like to see that
> feature.

I would like to see the code which will get executed after panic and 
before crash_kexec(). This potentially makes crash dump feature unreliable
in the sense one can now register on panic_notifier_list and try to
do whole lot of things and might get stuck there. After the system
has crashed, one is not supposed to do a whole lot.

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-26 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-19 12:15 Takenori Nagano
2007-07-26 14:07 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-26 15:32   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2007-07-26 15:34     ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-26 15:44       ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-26 15:47         ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-26 15:54           ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-26 16:14             ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-26 16:21               ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-26 23:28             ` Takenori Nagano
2007-07-30  9:16               ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-30 13:42                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-07-31  5:55                   ` Takenori Nagano
2007-07-31  6:53                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-01  9:26                       ` Takenori Nagano
2007-08-01 10:00                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-02  8:11                           ` Takenori Nagano
2007-08-02 11:28                           ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-03  4:05                             ` Keith Owens
2007-08-03  6:25                               ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-03  6:34                                 ` Keith Owens
2007-08-03  7:37                                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-03  7:10                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-05 11:07                               ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-14  8:34                                 ` Takenori Nagano
2007-08-14  8:37                                   ` Bernhard Walle
2007-08-14  8:48                                     ` Takenori Nagano
2007-08-14  8:53                                       ` Bernhard Walle
2007-08-14 13:24                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-16  9:26                                       ` Takenori Nagano
2007-08-16  9:45                                         ` Bernhard Walle
2007-08-17 10:56                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-21  7:45                                           ` Takenori Nagano
2007-08-23  3:52                                             ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-21 13:18                                           ` Jay Lan
2007-08-21 13:21                                             ` Bernhard Walle
2007-08-23  3:56                                             ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-23 17:34                                               ` Jay Lan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070726153240.GA15969@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bwalle@suse.de \
    --cc=k-miyoshi@cb.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --subject='Re: [patch] add kdump_after_notifier' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).