LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7
@ 2007-08-05  5:13 Steven Rostedt
  2007-08-05  6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2007-08-05  5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, LKML, RT, Paul E. McKenney

Ingo,

The below ifndef, shouldn't that be ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS ?
I hit that warning while I was running !PREEMPT_RT but with both hard
and softiqs as threads.


int __sched cond_resched_softirq(void)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
	WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq());
#endif
	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
		local_bh_enable();
		__cond_resched();
		local_bh_disable();
		return 1;
	}
	return 0;
}


-- Steve

P.S. I really found out that the system becomes VERY non-responsive when
you run with both hard and softirqs as threads, but with
PREEMPT_NONE ;-)




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7
  2007-08-05  5:13 [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7 Steven Rostedt
@ 2007-08-05  6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
  2007-08-05 22:36   ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2007-08-05  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, LKML, RT, Paul E. McKenney


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> Ingo,
> 
> The below ifndef, shouldn't that be ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS ? I 
> hit that warning while I was running !PREEMPT_RT but with both hard 
> and softiqs as threads.

yeah, indeed - fixed.

> P.S. I really found out that the system becomes VERY non-responsive 
> when you run with both hard and softirqs as threads, but with 
> PREEMPT_NONE ;-)

hm. That's not supposed to happen. Could there be some wakeup or softirq 
processing problem?

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7
  2007-08-05  6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2007-08-05 22:36   ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2007-08-05 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, LKML, RT, Paul E. McKenney

On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 08:56 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> 
> > P.S. I really found out that the system becomes VERY non-responsive 
> > when you run with both hard and softirqs as threads, but with 
> > PREEMPT_NONE ;-)
> 
> hm. That's not supposed to happen. Could there be some wakeup or softirq 
> processing problem?
> 
> 	Ingo

Well, it happened right after I installed the ath driver (from
http://svn.madwifi.org/trunk ).  But I've recompiled my system with
PREEMPT_RT and it works fine now.  I can investigate it later, but I
currently need this system working with a PREEMPT_RT kernel.

-- Steve



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-05 22:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-05  5:13 [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7 Steven Rostedt
2007-08-05  6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-05 22:36   ` Steven Rostedt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).