LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] UML - Simplify helper stack handling
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:41:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070805204114.GA19857@dreamland.darkstar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070627233701.8e53f3cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Il Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:37:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton ha scritto: 
> 
> So I'm running the generic version of this on i386 with 8k stacks (below),
> with a quick LTP run.
> 
> Holy cow, either we use a _lot_ of stack or these numbers are off:
> 
> vmm:/home/akpm> dmesg -s 1000000|grep 'bytes left' 
> khelper used greatest stack depth: 7176 bytes left
> khelper used greatest stack depth: 7064 bytes left
> khelper used greatest stack depth: 6840 bytes left
> khelper used greatest stack depth: 6812 bytes left
> hostname used greatest stack depth: 6636 bytes left
> uname used greatest stack depth: 6592 bytes left
> uname used greatest stack depth: 6284 bytes left
> hotplug used greatest stack depth: 5568 bytes left
> rpc.nfsd used greatest stack depth: 5136 bytes left
> chown02 used greatest stack depth: 4956 bytes left
> fchown01 used greatest stack depth: 4892 bytes left
> 
> That's the sum of process stack and interrupt stack, but I doubt if this
> little box is using much interrupt stack space.
> 
> No wonder people are still getting stack overflows with 4k stacks...

Hi Andrew,
I was a bit worried about stack usage on my setup and google found your
mail :P

FYI:

khelper used greatest stack depth: 3228 bytes left
khelper used greatest stack depth: 3124 bytes left
busybox used greatest stack depth: 2808 bytes left
modprobe used greatest stack depth: 2744 bytes left
busybox used greatest stack depth: 2644 bytes left
modprobe used greatest stack depth: 1836 bytes left
modprobe used greatest stack depth: 1176 bytes left
java used greatest stack depth: 932 bytes left
java used greatest stack depth: 540 bytes left

I'm running git-current, with 4KiB stacks; filesystems are ext3 and XFS
on LVM (on libata devices).
Does it make sense to raise STACK_WARN to get a stack trace in do_IRQ?
Or is 540 bytes still "safe" taking into account the separate IRQ stack?

Luca
-- 
42

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-05 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-14 20:26 Jeff Dike
2007-06-26 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-26 21:53   ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2007-06-26 22:07     ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-28  6:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-03 15:28   ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2007-07-03 15:58     ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-03 17:26     ` Jeff Dike
2007-08-05 20:41   ` Luca Tettamanti [this message]
2007-08-05 20:54     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070805204114.GA19857@dreamland.darkstar.lan \
    --to=kronos.it@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 4/5] UML - Simplify helper stack handling' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).