LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Eric W Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Linux MM Mailing List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [-mm PATCH 7/10] Memory controller OOM handling (v7)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:51:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070824152105.16582.19770.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070824151948.16582.34424.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop>


From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>

Out of memory handling for containers over their limit. A task from the
container over limit is chosen using the existing OOM logic and killed.

TODO:
1. As discussed in the OLS BOF session, consider implementing a user
space policy for OOM handling.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>

Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |    1 +
 mm/memcontrol.c            |    1 +
 mm/oom_kill.c              |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~mem-control-out-of-memory include/linux/memcontrol.h
--- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mem-control-out-of-memory	2007-08-24 20:46:08.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2-balbir/include/linux/memcontrol.h	2007-08-24 20:46:08.000000000 +0530
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern unsigned long mem_container_isola
 					int mode, struct zone *z,
 					struct mem_container *mem_cont,
 					int active);
+extern void mem_container_out_of_memory(struct mem_container *mem);
 
 static inline void mem_container_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
 {
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~mem-control-out-of-memory mm/memcontrol.c
--- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/mm/memcontrol.c~mem-control-out-of-memory	2007-08-24 20:46:08.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c	2007-08-24 20:46:08.000000000 +0530
@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ int mem_container_charge(struct page *pa
 		}
 
 		css_put(&mem->css);
+		mem_container_out_of_memory(mem);
 		goto free_pc;
 	}
 
diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~mem-control-out-of-memory mm/oom_kill.c
--- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/mm/oom_kill.c~mem-control-out-of-memory	2007-08-24 20:46:08.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2-balbir/mm/oom_kill.c	2007-08-24 20:46:08.000000000 +0530
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpuset.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
 
 int sysctl_panic_on_oom;
 /* #define DEBUG */
@@ -48,7 +49,8 @@ int sysctl_panic_on_oom;
  *    of least surprise ... (be careful when you change it)
  */
 
-unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
+unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime,
+			struct mem_container *mem)
 {
 	unsigned long points, cpu_time, run_time, s;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
@@ -61,6 +63,13 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CONTAINER_MEM_CONT
+	if (mem != NULL && mm->mem_container != mem) {
+		task_unlock(p);
+		return 0;
+	}
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * The memory size of the process is the basis for the badness.
 	 */
@@ -198,7 +207,8 @@ static inline int constrained_alloc(stru
  *
  * (not docbooked, we don't want this one cluttering up the manual)
  */
-static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints)
+static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
+						struct mem_container *mem)
 {
 	struct task_struct *g, *p;
 	struct task_struct *chosen = NULL;
@@ -252,7 +262,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
 		if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
 			continue;
 
-		points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec);
+		points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec, mem);
 		if (points > *ppoints || !chosen) {
 			chosen = p;
 			*ppoints = points;
@@ -364,6 +374,30 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_
 	return oom_kill_task(p);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CONTAINER_MEM_CONT
+void mem_container_out_of_memory(struct mem_container *mem)
+{
+	unsigned long points = 0;
+	struct task_struct *p;
+
+	container_lock();
+	rcu_read_lock();
+retry:
+	p = select_bad_process(&points, mem);
+	if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (!p)
+		p = current;
+
+	if (oom_kill_process(p, points, "Memory container out of memory"))
+		goto retry;
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	container_unlock();
+}
+#endif
+
 static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(oom_notify_list);
 
 int register_oom_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
@@ -436,7 +470,7 @@ retry:
 		 * Rambo mode: Shoot down a process and hope it solves whatever
 		 * issues we may have.
 		 */
-		p = select_bad_process(&points);
+		p = select_bad_process(&points, NULL);
 
 		if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
 			goto out;
_

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-24 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-24 15:19 [-mm PATCH 0/10] Memory controller introduction (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:19 ` [-mm PATCH 1/10] Memory controller resource counters (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:20 ` [-mm PATCH 2/10] Memory controller containers setup (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:20 ` [-mm PATCH 3/10] Memory controller accounting " Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:20 ` [-mm PATCH 4/10] Memory controller memory accounting (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:20 ` [-mm PATCH 5/10] Memory controller task migration (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-27  8:26   ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-08-27 10:39     ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-28  8:32       ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2007-08-28 20:04         ` Paul Menage
2007-08-24 15:20 ` [-mm PATCH 6/10] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:21 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-08-24 15:21 ` [-mm PATCH 8/10] Memory controller add switch to control what type of pages to limit (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:21 ` [-mm PATCH 9/10] Memory controller make page_referenced() container aware (v7) Balbir Singh
2007-08-24 15:21 ` [-mm PATCH 10/10] Memory controller add documentation Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070824152105.16582.19770.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    --subject='Re: [-mm PATCH 7/10] Memory controller OOM handling (v7)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).