LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - PPS support for Linux
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025083916.GT9748@enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adasl414jzw.fsf@cisco.com>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:08:19PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > +void pps_unregister_source(int source)
> > ...
> > + wait_event(pps->usage_queue, atomic_read(&pps->usage) == 0);
> > +
> > + pps_sysfs_remove_source_entry(pps);
> > + pps_unregister_cdev(pps);
> > + kfree(pps);
>
> This reference counting looks dubious to me... later on in the code
> you have:
>
> > +static int pps_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct pps_device *pps = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
> > + struct pps_device, cdev);
> > +
> > + /* Lock the PPS source against (possible) deregistration */
> > + atomic_inc(&pps->usage);
>
> with no locking, so I see no reason why the atomic_inc() couldn't
> happen right after the wait_event() sees a count of 0 and lets the
> deregistration continue. Which would lead to use-after-free.
Since pps_unregister_source() is defined as:
void pps_unregister_source(int source)
{
struct pps_device *pps;
spin_lock_irq(&idr_lock);
pps = idr_find(&pps_idr, source);
if (!pps) {
spin_unlock_irq(&idr_lock);
return;
}
/* This should be done first in order to deny IRQ handlers
* to access PPS structs
*/
idr_remove(&pps_idr, pps->id);
spin_unlock_irq(&idr_lock);
wait_event(pps->usage_queue, atomic_read(&pps->usage) == 0);
pps_sysfs_remove_source_entry(pps);
pps_unregister_cdev(pps);
kfree(pps);
}
changing pps_cdev_open() as follow should resolve this problem:
static int pps_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct pps_device *pps = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
struct pps_device, cdev);
int found;
spin_lock_irq(&idr_lock);
found = idr_find(&pps_idr, pps->id) != NULL;
/* Lock the PPS source against (possible) deregistration */
if (found)
atomic_inc(&pps->usage);
spin_unlock_irq(&idr_lock);
if (!found)
return -ENODEV;
file->private_data = pps;
return 0;
}
Is that right?
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@gnudd.com
Embedded Systems giometti@linux.it
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-23 18:04 Rodolfo Giometti
2007-10-23 20:17 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-23 20:35 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-10-23 20:55 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-10-23 21:08 ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-24 7:00 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2007-10-25 8:39 ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
2007-10-25 20:32 ` Rodolfo Giometti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071025083916.GT9748@enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - PPS support for Linux' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).