LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@evalesco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][BUG] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:47:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080109114746.GF25527@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4df4ef0c0801090332y345ccb67se98409edc65fd6bf@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:32:53PM +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> Since no reaction in LKML was recieved for this message it seemed
> logical to suggest closing the bug #2645 as "WONTFIX":
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c15
Thank you!
A quick run-down for those who don't know what this is about:
Some applications use mmap() to modify files. Common examples are databases.
Linux does not update the mtime of files that are modified using mmap, even if
msync() is called.
This is very clearly against OpenGroup specifications.
This misfeatures causes such files to be silently *excluded* from normal backup
runs.
Solaris implements this properly.
NT has the same bug as Linux, using their private bastardisation of the mmap
interface - but since they don't care about SuS and are broken in so many other
ways, that really doesn't matter.
So, dear kernel developers, can we please integrate this patch to make Linux
stop silently excluding peoples databases from their backup?
--
/ jakob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-07 17:54 Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 11:32 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 11:47 ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2008-01-09 12:22 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2008-01-09 14:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2008-01-09 15:31 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 21:28 ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-09 20:50 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 21:01 ` Klaus S. Madsen
2008-01-09 21:06 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-09 22:06 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 22:19 ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-09 22:33 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2008-01-09 23:41 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 0:03 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 8:51 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2008-01-10 10:53 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 15:45 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 15:56 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 16:07 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 16:40 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 16:52 ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-10 16:46 ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-10 20:48 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-10 0:48 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 0:40 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 21:18 ` Peter Staubach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080109114746.GF25527@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=joe@evalesco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=salikhmetov@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH][RFC][BUG] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).