LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hwclock failure in x86.git
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:04:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080110220444.4c9efdec.kjwinchester@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4786C2CF.4070204@zytor.com>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:13:51 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Kevin Winchester wrote:
> > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Kevin Winchester wrote:
> >>> My first time building and booting the mm branch of x86.git was pretty
> >>> successful. The only error I noticed was the following in my dmesg:
> >>>
> >>> hwclock[622] general protection ip:804b226 sp:bff43e30 error:0
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure exactly how to debug this. I could bisect, but there seems
> >>> to be some useful debug information in there, so there might be
> >>> something better to try first.
> >>>
> >> That's a userspace IP; it implies the userspace hwclock binary did
> >> something bad, or the kernel didn't permit it to do something it should
> >> have. The best thing to do would probably to strace hwclock and see
> >> what it did when it died.
> >>
> >
> > Unfortunately, but the time I can get a chance to run hwclock, the
> > problem seems to have fixed itself. I tried booting into single user
> > mode, but `/etc/init.d/hwclock.sh restart` succeeds once I have my prompt.
> >
>
> The other thing you can do is to download the debug information and
> source code for hwclock from your particular distro, and find out
> exactly what operation inside the hwclock binary is triggering the segfault.
>
> The only other option is to bisect.
>
Bisect says...
4b5ea240a0c05ff90c4959fd91f0caec7b9bef1b is first bad commit
commit 4b5ea240a0c05ff90c4959fd91f0caec7b9bef1b
Author: mboton@gmail.com <mboton@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jan 9 13:31:11 2008 +0100
x86: ioport_{32|64}.c unification
ioport_{32|64}.c unification.
This patch unifies the code from the ioport_32.c and ioport_64.c files.
Tested and working fine with i386 and x86_64 kernels.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Botón <mboton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
I'll take a look at the unification and see if I can see anything obvious.
--
Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-11 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-10 23:28 Kevin Winchester
2008-01-10 23:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-01-10 23:50 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-01-11 1:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-01-11 2:04 ` Kevin Winchester [this message]
2008-01-11 14:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-11 23:58 ` Miguel Botón
2008-01-12 1:04 ` [PATCH] x86: fix ioport unification on 32-bit [was: Re: hwclock failure in x86.git] Chris Wright
2008-01-12 1:06 ` [PATCH] x86: refactor ioport unification Chris Wright
2008-01-14 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14 8:27 ` [PATCH] x86: fix ioport unification on 32-bit [was: Re: hwclock failure in x86.git] Ingo Molnar
2008-01-11 2:27 ` hwclock failure in x86.git Kevin Winchester
2008-01-11 2:55 ` Zach Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080110220444.4c9efdec.kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--to=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: hwclock failure in x86.git' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).