LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mboton@gmail.com" <mboton@gmail.com>,
	Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix ioport unification on 32-bit [was: Re: hwclock failure in x86.git]
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:04:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080112010443.GA5476@sequoia.sous-sol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080111140346.GA13604@elte.hu>

* Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote:
> thanks for tracking it down. I pulled that commit for now. But it would 
> be nice to figure out what's going on there.

Zach was right. The unification was broken for 32-bit; it was missing
the actual pushf/popf EFLAGS manipluation (set_iopl_mask()) and would've
broken task switching between processes w/ different iopl in paravirt
guests too.  64-bit sys_iopl just does pt_regs->flags modification and
lets syscall/sysret plus ptregscall sync and do EFLAGS update.

Also, use of volatile looks like leftover cruft.

This patch in on top of Miguel's (can respin to standalone if that's better).
Tested (on both 32 and 64-bit) with simple:

  #include <stdlib.h>
  #include <sys/io.h>
  
  main()
  {
  	if (iopl(3) == 0)
  		asm ("cli\nsti\n"::);
  }

thanks,
-chris
--

From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix ioport unification on 32-bit

ioport unification was broken for 32-bit; it was missing
the acutal pushf/popf EFLAGS manipulation (set_iopl_mask()).
Also, use of volatile looks like leftover cruft.

Cc: mboton@gmail.com
Cc: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
index e723ff3..be72d80 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
@@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long from, unsigned long num, int turn_on)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned long regsp)
 {
-	volatile struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)&regsp;
+	struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)&regsp;
 	unsigned int level = regs->bx;
 	unsigned int old = (regs->flags >> 12) & 3;
+	struct thread_struct *t = &current->thread;
 
 	if (level > 3)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -127,8 +128,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned long regsp)
 		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
 			return -EPERM;
 	}
+	t->iopl = level << 12;
 	regs->flags = (regs->flags & ~X86_EFLAGS_IOPL) | (level << 12);
-
+	set_iopl_mask(t->iopl);
 	return 0;
 }
 #else

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-12  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-10 23:28 hwclock failure in x86.git Kevin Winchester
2008-01-10 23:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-01-10 23:50   ` Kevin Winchester
2008-01-11  1:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-01-11  2:04       ` Kevin Winchester
2008-01-11 14:03         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-11 23:58           ` Miguel Botón
2008-01-12  1:04           ` Chris Wright [this message]
2008-01-12  1:06             ` [PATCH] x86: refactor ioport unification Chris Wright
2008-01-14  8:32               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14  8:27             ` [PATCH] x86: fix ioport unification on 32-bit [was: Re: hwclock failure in x86.git] Ingo Molnar
2008-01-11  2:27       ` hwclock failure in x86.git Kevin Winchester
2008-01-11  2:55         ` Zach Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080112010443.GA5476@sequoia.sous-sol.org \
    --to=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mboton@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    --subject='[PATCH] x86: fix ioport unification on 32-bit [was: Re: hwclock failure in x86.git]' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).