LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> To: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH 1/5] Implement module aliasing for i2c to translate from device tree names Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:41:14 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080113154114.4a1c5166@hyperion.delvare> (raw) In-Reply-To: <9e4733910801120826haa8905dk863ed1c8e9f420c9@mail.gmail.com> Hi Jon, On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:26:34 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > The common scheme used elsewhere in the kernel for handling more than > one device in a single driver is aliases. The i2c code's existing > driver_name/type combination is a different way of implementing the > same feature. But there is no real need for driver_name/type on any > platform if aliases are used. Back in version 10 or 11 I had code in > there which replaced the two fields with aliases on all platforms but > too many people objected so I removed it.. While I agree that aliases make i2c_client.driver_name obsolete, i2c_client.type is still needed. Not for device/driver matching in the kernel, granted, but for device identification from userspace. This is a first problem your patch has: when using your aliasing mechanism, the type string is left empty. i2c-core exports this value to user-space via the "name" sysfs attribute, and some libraries and applications make use of it. I know of libsensors at least, but I guess there are more. I can't apply your patch until this problem is solved, otherwise we would break some user-space applications. > IMHO, driver_name/type should be removed in new style drivers and > replaced with aliases on all platforms since aliases are the standard > kernel mechanism. I agree. But we can take your aliasing code now (once you have addressed the issues I raised) and convert the users of driver_name later; it doesn't have to be done all at once. The second problem I have with your patch is that you make use of the driver_name field, while I ultimately want to get rid of it. I'd rather see you use a different field for aliases, so that the later removal of the driver_name field and the associated mechanism is easier. A third, related problem, is the contents of the modalias file when using your patch. When I tested on my ADM1032 evaluation board, the modalias contained "adm1032". This isn't a valid module alias string: "modprobe adm1032" doesn't work. What works is "modprobe i2c:Nadm1032" so the modalias file should contain "i2c:Nadm1032". Just take a look at all modalias files in /sys, they all include the subsystem prefix and a simple modprobe `cat modalias` loads the required driver. I fail to see why the i2c subsystem would be different. I said this is related to the second problem because right now, i2c-core can't easily differentiate between driver names and aliases, as both are stored in i2c_client.driver_name. Having separate fields would make it possible (and relatively easy) to add the required prefix before aliases but not before driver names. The only drawback is that it will increase the size of the i2c_client structure, but I do not care that much given that it is only temporary. -- Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-13 14:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-12-20 4:41 [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c Jon Smirl 2007-12-20 4:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] Implement module aliasing for i2c to translate from device tree names Jon Smirl 2008-01-11 19:20 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare 2008-01-12 8:46 ` Jean Delvare 2008-01-12 16:26 ` Jon Smirl 2008-01-13 14:41 ` Jean Delvare [this message] 2008-01-13 16:24 ` Jon Smirl 2008-01-13 17:40 ` Jean Delvare 2008-01-13 18:01 ` Jon Smirl 2008-01-13 18:45 ` Jean Delvare 2008-01-13 18:50 ` Jon Smirl 2008-01-13 19:05 ` Jean Delvare 2007-12-20 4:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] Modify several rtc drivers to use the alias names list property of i2c Jon Smirl 2007-12-20 4:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] Clean up error returns Jon Smirl 2007-12-20 4:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] Convert PowerPC MPC i2c to of_platform_driver from platform_driver Jon Smirl 2007-12-20 5:16 ` David Gibson 2007-12-20 6:01 ` Olof Johansson 2007-12-20 6:04 ` Stefan Roese 2007-12-20 15:56 ` Jon Smirl 2007-12-20 4:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] Convert pfc8563 i2c driver from old style to new style Jon Smirl 2007-12-20 23:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c Jon Smirl 2007-12-27 16:47 ` Jon Smirl 2007-12-28 12:14 ` Jean Delvare 2008-01-11 8:56 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare 2008-01-11 15:52 ` Jon Smirl 2008-01-11 16:05 ` Jochen Friedrich 2008-01-11 19:15 ` Jean Delvare 2008-01-11 20:16 ` Jon Smirl 2008-01-12 9:08 ` Jean Delvare 2008-01-12 16:00 ` Jon Smirl 2008-01-13 15:09 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080113154114.4a1c5166@hyperion.delvare \ --to=khali@linux-fr.org \ --cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \ --cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).