LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] md: Fix use-after-free bug when dropping an rdev from an md array.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:43:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080114034322.GO27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18314.54601.196877.828373@notabene.brown>

On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:21:45PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:

> Maybe it isn't there any more....
> 
> Once upon a time, when I 
>    echo remove > /sys/block/mdX/md/dev-YYY/state

Egads.  And just what will protect you from parallel callers
of state_store()?  buffer->mutex does *not* do that - it only
gives you exclusion on given struct file.  Run the command
above from several shells and you've got independent open
from each redirect => different struct file *and* different
buffer for each => no exclusion whatsoever.

And _that_ is present right in the mainline tree - it's unrelated
to -mm kobject changes.

BTW, yes, you do have a deadlock there - kobject_del() will try to evict
children, which will include waiting for currently running ->store()
to finish, which will include the caller since .../state *is* a child of
that sucker.

The real problem is the lack of any kind of exclusion considerations in
md.c itself, AFAICS.  Fun with ordering is secondary (BTW, yes, it is
a problem - will sysfs ->store() to attribute between export_rdev() and
kobject_del() work correctly?)


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-14  3:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-14  1:45 [PATCH 000 of 6] md: various fixes for md NeilBrown
2008-01-14  1:45 ` [PATCH 001 of 6] md: Fix an occasional deadlock in raid5 NeilBrown
2008-01-16  5:01   ` dean gaudet
2008-01-16  5:54     ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-16  6:13       ` dean gaudet
2008-01-16  7:09         ` Dan Williams
2008-01-16  7:15           ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-16 21:54             ` Neil Brown
2008-01-14  1:45 ` [PATCH 002 of 6] md: Fix use-after-free bug when dropping an rdev from an md array NeilBrown
2008-01-14  2:04   ` Al Viro
2008-01-14  3:21     ` Neil Brown
2008-01-14  3:43       ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-01-14  4:48         ` Neil Brown
2008-01-14  6:28           ` Neil Brown
2008-01-14 12:59             ` Al Viro
2008-01-14 13:56               ` Al Viro
2008-01-14  1:45 ` [PATCH 003 of 6] md: Change a few 'int' to 'size_t' in md NeilBrown
2008-01-14  1:45 ` [PATCH 004 of 6] md: Change INTERATE_MDDEV to for_each_mddev NeilBrown
2008-01-14  1:45 ` [PATCH 005 of 6] md: Change ITERATE_RDEV to rdev_for_each NeilBrown
2008-01-14  1:45 ` [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Change ITERATE_RDEV_GENERIC to rdev_for_each_list, and remove ITERATE_RDEV_PENDING NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080114034322.GO27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] md: Fix use-after-free bug when dropping an rdev from an md array.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).