LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Marc Pignat" <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>,
wim@iguana.be, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] watchdog on gpio
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:30:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080114143019.5d7ffaf4@siona> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0801140422n3d3e3835v7f57dbe33c7a6db0@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:22:39 -0500
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is: platform_driver_probe(). It takes the probe function as a
> > parameter so that it can be left out of the platform_driver struct.
> > After it returns, there are no references to the probe function left
> > around, so if you call platform_driver_probe() instead of
> > platform_driver_register(), the probe function can be __init.
>
> ah, thanks for that. i think in that case, there's no way to bind the
> release function to the process ? which means the driver is no longer
> unloadable ? which means the platform driver release function can be
> scrubbed as well as the module exit function as well as changing the
> Kconfig to be a bool ?
No, you can still provide a remove() callback, but it can usually be
__exit_p since it will only be needed if you compile the driver as a
module.
The platform_driver will be registered just as before; the only
difference is that it won't have a probe() callback so dynamically
added devices can't be bound to the driver. If the driver has a
remove() callback, it will be called when the driver is unregistered,
but that will usually only happen if the driver is compiled as a
module (and has a module exit function.)
Haavard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-14 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-10 15:11 Marc Pignat
2008-01-10 17:14 ` Ben Dooks
2008-01-11 16:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2008-01-14 7:34 ` Marc Pignat
2008-01-14 8:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-14 8:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-14 9:03 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-14 9:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-14 9:29 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-14 9:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-14 12:14 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-01-14 12:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-14 13:30 ` Haavard Skinnemoen [this message]
2008-01-14 12:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-01-14 13:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-01-14 13:56 ` printk-wrapper with sectionized string constants [was: Re: [RFC, PATCH] watchdog on gpio] Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080114143019.5d7ffaf4@siona \
--to=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
--subject='Re: [RFC, PATCH] watchdog on gpio' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).