LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: gerg@uclinux.org, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RFC: Removal of the v850 port?
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:23:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080120192356.GI8669@does.not.exist> (raw)

Is anyone maintaining the v850 port in the Linux kernel or will work on 
getting it back into a usable state in the foreseeable future?

Otherwise I'll send a patch to remove it.

That's not meant personally against anyone, and it would not prevent the 
port from getting back into the kernel in the future if someone will 
start getting it back into a usable state, but in it's current state 
it is simply useless.

cu
Adrian


----- Forwarded message from Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> -----

Date:  Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:50:21 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Status of the v850 port?

Trying to compile the v850 port brings you many compile errors, one of 
them exists since at least kernel 2.6.19.

Are there any patches in some external tree that should be merged?

Or will anyone work on getting this port back into a usable state in the 
forseeable future?

Otherwise the only reasonable option would be to remove this port from 
the kernel sources since it is dead code.

cu
Adrian

----- End forwarded message -----


             reply	other threads:[~2008-01-20 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-20 19:23 Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-21  0:15 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-01-28 22:13   ` [2.6 patch] remove the v850 port Adrian Bunk
2008-02-01 15:14     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05 11:25       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080120192356.GI8669@does.not.exist \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles@gnu.org \
    --subject='Re: RFC: Removal of the v850 port?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).