LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RFC: Removal of the v850 port?
@ 2008-01-20 19:23 Adrian Bunk
  2008-01-21  0:15 ` Greg Ungerer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2008-01-20 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gerg, Miles Bader; +Cc: linux-kernel

Is anyone maintaining the v850 port in the Linux kernel or will work on 
getting it back into a usable state in the foreseeable future?

Otherwise I'll send a patch to remove it.

That's not meant personally against anyone, and it would not prevent the 
port from getting back into the kernel in the future if someone will 
start getting it back into a usable state, but in it's current state 
it is simply useless.


----- Forwarded message from Adrian Bunk <> -----

Date:  Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:50:21 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <>
To: Miles Bader <>
Subject: Status of the v850 port?

Trying to compile the v850 port brings you many compile errors, one of 
them exists since at least kernel 2.6.19.

Are there any patches in some external tree that should be merged?

Or will anyone work on getting this port back into a usable state in the 
forseeable future?

Otherwise the only reasonable option would be to remove this port from 
the kernel sources since it is dead code.


----- End forwarded message -----

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-05 11:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-20 19:23 RFC: Removal of the v850 port? Adrian Bunk
2008-01-21  0:15 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-01-28 22:13   ` [2.6 patch] remove the v850 port Adrian Bunk
2008-02-01 15:14     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05 11:25       ` Adrian Bunk

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).