LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-tiny@selenic.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:39:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080122143912.GJ7304@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1200695950.25782.28.camel@cinder.waste.org>
* Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > btw., are there any pending arch/x86 bits in -tiny? (stupid
> > question: were can i get the most uptodate version of -tiny from?)
>
> It's not a stupid question. I dropped updating the tree regulary some
> time ago to focus on merging bits and then got a bit side-tracked by
> this little thing called "version control".
>
> Michael is attempting to get the tree started again and has put a
> quilt up here:
>
> http://elinux.org/images/3/3c/Tiny-quilt-2.6.23-0.tar.bz2
cool! A few comments about the patches that affect arch/x86:
dmi_blacklist.patch:
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMI_SCAN
dmi_scan_machine();
+#endif
put that #ifdef into the include file and make it an inlined NOP in the
!DMI_SCAN case. That de-#ifdef-ifies the .c files.
cpu-support.patch: ditto.
mtrr.patch: ditto.
inflate-error.patch: please use:
quilt refresh --diffstat --sort --no-timestamps -p 1
when generating patches, to make them reviewable, uniform and
noise-free.
no-doublefault.patch: looks ok. Please add proper metadata and submit to
lkml.
sbf.patch: looks ok.
sysenter.patch:
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSENTER
sysenter_setup();
enable_sep_cpu();
+#endif
hide these #ifdefs in the include file. (as it already does) Looks ok
otherwise.
threadinfo-ool.patch: doesnt this break the scheduler? Had something
like this in -rt, i turned 'current' into a const actually, but had
trouble with keeping from gcc to do the right thing in sched.c. I guess
we could live with current_non_const() that gets it from assembly. (and
hence gcc wont be able to optimize it away in the middle of the
context-switch) But when done properly, this is both a nice, measurable
speedup on UP, and a nice space-saver.
tiny-cflags.patch: obsolete? Isnt CFLAGS already extendable? Question to
Sam i guess.
tsc.patch: look ok. needs x86.git porting.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-22 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-17 15:43 [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-17 16:36 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-17 17:05 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-17 17:13 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-17 18:32 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-17 22:15 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 3:16 ` Taral
2008-01-18 8:22 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-19 7:21 ` Taral
2008-01-18 11:02 ` [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 12:14 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 12:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 13:03 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 13:50 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-18 13:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 14:04 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-18 16:29 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 17:10 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-18 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 22:39 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-22 14:39 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-22 16:37 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-22 18:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-22 19:17 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-20 4:59 ` Rob Landley
2008-01-20 16:44 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-21 15:31 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-23 22:30 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-24 17:09 ` [PATCH] x86: fix?unconditional?arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling Adrian Bunk
2008-01-24 20:12 ` [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 16:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-20 12:25 ` Rob Landley
2008-01-17 22:44 ` [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080122143912.GJ7304@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=Linux-tiny@selenic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael-lists@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).