LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Asbjorn Sannes <asbjorsa@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unpredictable performance
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:00:24 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801260100.24597.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4799C8E8.9060501@ifi.uio.no>

On Friday 25 January 2008 22:32, Asbjorn Sannes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experiencing unpredictable results with the following test
> without other processes running (exception is udev, I believe):
> cd /usr/src/test
> tar -jxf ../linux-2.6.22.12
> cp ../working-config linux-2.6.22.12/.config
> cd linux-2.6.22.12
> make oldconfig
> time make -j3 > /dev/null # This is what I note down as a "test" result
> cd /usr/src ; umount /usr/src/test ; mkfs.ext3 /dev/cc/test
> and then reboot
>
> The kernel is booted with the parameter mem=81920000
>
> For 2.6.23.14 the results vary from (real time) 33m30.551s to 45m32.703s
> (30 runs)
> For 2.6.23.14 with nop i/o scheduler from 29m8.827s to 55m36.744s (24 runs)
> For 2.6.22.14 also varied a lot.. but, lost results :(
> For 2.6.20.21 only vary from 34m32.054s to 38m1.928s (10 runs)
>
> Any idea of what can cause this? I have tried to make the runs as equal
> as possible, rebooting between each run.. i/o scheduler is cfq as default.
>
> sys and user time only varies a couple of seconds.. and the order of
> when it is "fast" and when it is "slow" is completly random, but it
> seems that the results are mostly concentrated around the mean.

Hmm, lots of things could cause it. With such big variations in
elapsed time, and small variations on CPU time, I guess the fs/IO
layers are the prime suspects, although it could also involve the
VM if you are doing a fair amount of page reclaim.

Can you boot with enough memory such that it never enters page
reclaim? `grep scan /proc/vmstat` to check.

Otherwise you could mount the working directory as tmpfs to
eliminate IO.

bisecting it down to a single patch would be really helpful if you
can spare the time.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-25 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-25 11:32 Asbjorn Sannes
2008-01-25 14:00 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2008-01-25 14:31   ` Asbjørn Sannes
2008-01-25 15:03     ` Asbjørn Sannes
2008-01-26  0:38       ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-28  9:12         ` Asbjørn Sannes
2008-01-25 17:16 ` Ray Lee
2008-01-25 20:49   ` Asbjørn Sannes
     [not found]     ` <2c0942db0801251332k43e0b7d5xa012227f19ac4983@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-28  9:02       ` Asbjørn Sannes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200801260100.24597.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=asbjorsa@ifi.uio.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: Unpredictable performance' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).