LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: maxk@qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
srostedt@redhat.com, ghaskins@novell.com
Subject: Re: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:59:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080128085910.7d38e9f5.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201511305.6149.30.camel@lappy>
Thanks for the CC, Peter.
Ingo - see question at end of message.
Max wrote:
> We've had scheduler support for CPU isolation ever since O(1) scheduler went it.
> I'd like to extend it further to avoid kernel activity on those CPUs as much as possible.
I recently added the per-cpuset flag 'sched_load_balance' for some
other realtime folks, so that they can disable the kernel scheduler
load balancing on isolated CPUs. It essentially allows for dynamic
control of which CPUs are isolated by the scheduler, using the cpuset
hierarchy, rather than enhancing the 'isolated_cpus' mask. That
'isolated_cpus' mask remained a minimal kernel boottime parameter.
I believe this went to Linus's tree about Oct 2007.
It looks like you have three additional tweaks for realtime in this
patch set, with your patches:
[PATCH] [CPUISOL] Do not route IRQs to the CPUs isolated at boot
[PATCH] [CPUISOL] Support for workqueue isolation
[PATCH] [CPUISOL] Isolated CPUs should be ignored by the "stop machine"
It would be interesting to see a patchset with the above three realtime
tweaks, layered on this new cpuset 'sched_load_balance' apparatus, rather
than layered on changes to make 'isolated_cpus' more dynamic. Some of us
run realtime and cpuset-intensive loads on the same system, so like to
have those two capabilities co-operate with each other.
Ingo - what's your sense of the value of the above three realtime tweaks
(the last three patches in Max's patch set)?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-28 4:09 maxk
2008-01-28 4:09 ` [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Add config options for CPU isolation maxk
2008-01-28 4:09 ` [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Export CPU isolation bits maxk
2008-01-28 4:09 ` [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Do not route IRQs to the CPUs isolated at boot maxk
2008-01-28 4:09 ` [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Support for workqueue isolation maxk
2008-01-28 4:09 ` [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Isolated CPUs should be ignored by the "stop machine" maxk
2008-01-28 9:08 ` [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-28 14:59 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-01-28 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-28 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-28 18:54 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-01-28 18:46 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-01-28 19:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-28 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-28 21:42 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-05 0:32 ` CPU isolation and workqueues [was Re: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions] Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-01-28 18:37 ` [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-01-28 19:06 ` Paul Jackson
2008-01-28 21:47 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-01-31 19:06 ` Integrating cpusets and cpu isolation [was Re: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions] Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-02 6:16 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-03 5:57 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-03 7:53 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-04 6:03 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-04 10:54 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-04 23:19 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-05 2:46 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 4:08 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-01-28 18:32 ` [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-01-28 19:10 ` Paul Jackson
2008-01-28 23:41 ` Daniel Walker
2008-01-29 0:12 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-01-29 1:33 ` Daniel Walker
2008-02-04 6:53 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-01-31 12:16 ` Mark Hounschell
2008-01-31 19:13 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080128085910.7d38e9f5.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).