LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <>
To: Adrian Bunk <>
Cc:, Greg Kroah-Hartman <>
Subject: Re: sections mismatches: How to mark new false positives?
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:56:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

> I would suggest the following fix.

Looked a bit closer.
We have more warnings in this area and I see
code where we previously remove the __devinit

It looks like we should take all the HOTPLUG only
functions from probe.c and move them elsewhere
(hotplug.c or probe_hotplug.c) and then
only build this file if HOTPLUG is enabled.

This seems like a straightforward solution.
If no-one beats me I will look into that in the weekend.


      reply	other threads:[~2008-01-29 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-29 17:02 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-29 18:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-29 19:00   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-29 19:49     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-29 21:56       ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: sections mismatches: How to mark new false positives?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).