LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Mohr <andim2@users.sourceforge.net>
To: andi@lisas.de
Cc: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bunk@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs...
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:03:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080129230315.GA13389@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080101200908.GA14805@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply!
> 
> OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
> (preliminary posting, for review only)
> 
> Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
> thus might want to do -mm testing soon.

Any verdict on this one?

I happen to be asking now since silly me just ""upgraded"" a mere mortal's
sorta-production machine to 2.6.24 proper without remembering
that the previous -rc6 had contained a minor but effective change
to make those wires do their thing. Or, to tell it as it was,
"Mom wasn't impressed ;)".

Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?

Thanks,

Andreas Mohr

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-29 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-28 23:51 [RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs Andreas Mohr
2007-12-30  5:54 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-01 20:09   ` Andreas Mohr
2008-01-29 23:03     ` Andreas Mohr [this message]
2008-01-29 23:09       ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-30  6:49         ` Andreas Mohr
2008-01-30 16:34           ` Kok, Auke
2008-11-03  8:04             ` Andreas Mohr
2008-11-03  9:34               ` Jeff Kirsher
2008-01-01 20:10   ` Andreas Mohr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080129230315.GA13389@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de \
    --to=andim2@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=andi@lisas.de \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).