LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:36:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802050436.31070.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080130011550.GA31853@elte.hu>

On Wednesday, 30 January 2008 03:15:50 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from:
> 
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
> 
> Find the shortlog attached below.
> 
> Most of the changes we have described here:
> 
>     http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/21/230
> 
> It's not a small merge, it consists of 908 commits from 96 individual 
> arch/x86 developers (!):
> 
>     671 files changed, 42791 insertions(+), 38967 deletions(-)
> 
> so here are a few highlevel comments as well, in addition to the 
> shortlog:
> 
> - a number of core files are changed as well: most notably percpu,
>   debugging details, timers, the firewire remote debugging patch and ...
>   the KGDB remote debugging stub in kernel/kgdb.c.
> 
> - we tested KGDB to be merge-worthy within the x86 architecture (the 
>   only supported architecture for now) and it's better to have 
>   kernel/kgdb.c than arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c. The code is reasonably 
>   clean and the user-space exposure is small - the only real exposure is 
>   the decades-old remote GDB protocol. We are happy to fix up any 
>   further cleanliness comments that people might have - but we really 
>   wanted to start somewhere and get this thing moving. As an added 
>   bonus: finally a kernel debugger that can be read without puking too
>   much ;-) [anyone remember KDB?]
> 

The x86 tree was merged several times, but I don't see kgdb included in 
latest mainline -git.

So just one question, will it be included or no?

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-05  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30  1:15 Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31  0:33 ` x86 arch updates also broke s390 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31  9:34   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-01-31 10:24     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 12:37       ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-01  9:48     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01  9:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01  9:54       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-02-01 10:02         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 15:57 ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:12     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:15       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:21         ` WANG Cong
2008-01-31 16:24         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 16:52             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-31 16:29         ` sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:50           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-31 17:43             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 17:55               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-31 18:21               ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 18:38                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05  2:36 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2008-02-05  3:27   ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Linus Torvalds
2008-02-05  4:11     ` Phil Oester
2008-02-05  4:54       ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 12:08         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-07 20:00           ` Daniel Phillips
2008-02-08  4:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-08  9:51         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-05 17:45     ` John Stoffel
2008-02-05 17:52       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-02-08 18:24         ` Bernhard Kaindl
2008-02-08 19:38           ` remote DMA via FireWire (was Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25) Stefan Richter
2008-02-07 19:20     ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Daniel Phillips
2008-02-08 17:00     ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-08 17:48       ` Jan Kiszka
2008-02-08 18:57         ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-08 21:28           ` [RFC][PATCH] KGDB: remove kgdb-own fault handling (was: Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25) Jan Kiszka
2008-02-08 21:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-08 22:16               ` [RFC][PATCH] KGDB: remove kgdb-own fault handling Jason Wessel
2008-02-09 14:11 ` [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25 Amit Shah
2008-02-10 12:30   ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-12  7:16     ` Amit Shah
2008-02-13  8:56       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-13 10:19         ` Amit Shah
2008-02-06  2:28 David Cullen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200802050436.31070.maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --subject='Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).